Skip to main content

Whistleblower, liar, traitor, lunatic Steve Schmidt's humiliation brought to light what we already knew


Actor Woody Harrelson and leaker, liar, turncoat, and nut job Steve Schmidt / Getty Images

 There are no books. No money. Only facts. That was the title of Steve Schmidt's twisty substack post last week at the end of a two-day Twitter twist. During that time, he was away from the keyboard for no more than an hour, stilted and over-the-top attacks on the late war hero John McCain and his daughter Meghan.

Since then, he's widened his opening and bashed life, from Republican lawmakers (Rep. Elise Stefanik of New York, Gov. Pete Ricketts of Nebraska) to reporters (Maggie Haberman, Matt Lewis, Jonah Goldberg) and another segment of former Colleagues (sorry, Lincoln Project).

Schmidt, apparently having a nervous breakdown, denied any responsibility for McCain's decision to add Sarah Palin to his running mate in 2008. He claims he didn't even sit down with Palin before McCain made his choice, and in the end he didn't even vote for the old man.

"This is a flaw in John's judgment, not mine," he wrote. "My mistake was to leave John McCain and her alone in a room," Schmidt explained in an interview with the Kyiv Post a few days later. "The first time I spoke to her was after the decision," he said of Palin, adding that he looked back on the "banana" decision — whatever that meant.

Well, there is a book! It's called Game Change, and Schmidt and fellow runner Nicolle Wallace are its main sources. The book ultimately earned Schmidt a red carpet appearance with Woody Harrelson, who played him on the big screen.

According to Game Change, Palin's comments were hardly outsourced. The authors describe an hour-long conversation between Schmidt, Palin and McCain colleague Mark Salter in Flagsta, Arizona, home of McCain supporter Bob Delgado husband, before they were chosen. Schmidt "wanted to make sure Palin was prepared for what was to come and would follow through."

But he and Salter said they conceded the ball. "They didn't ask her to go deep into her knowledge of foreign or domestic policy," the book said. "They're not looking into her willingness to become vice president. They think she knows as much as the average governor, and if she doesn't, she'll know soon enough. They're not looking for a problem. They're looking for a last-minute solution."

Not just this book. There is news too! A 2012 New York Times article reported how Schmidt led the disastrous McCain campaign to fame and fortune through "self-criticism and challenges to his own party." (sound familiar?)

Schmidt's public inferiority complex made it clear to everyone on the campaign trail: he was unfaithful, he slandered Palin to protect his reputation, and these reporters breathlessly echoed a psychopath's 14 years of nonsense. farther. (Note to The New York Times reporter, your file is linked here.)

Now Schmidt says he is converting to Judaism. We hope that's a lie too, but if not, we'll wait for the epic Twitter thread to condemn Hashem. cannot be long.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What Is The Matrix of Ukraine War?

  The russian invasion  of Ukraine on 24 February 2022, launched by the Kremlin after months of rising tensions, quickly generated a flood of casualties and several million refugees, as well as bringing the senseless destruction of cities and towns. A negotiated peace may yet bring it to an end. But amid the continued bombardment of Ukrainian cities by Russian artillery and the ramping up of Western military aid to Ukraine, the possibility remains that the war will continue. With that, the odds of a wider conflagration involving several nuclear-armed states would shorten alarmingly. While it is not yet clear how the war will unfold, the world stands at the threshold of a troubled new period. What follows is an attempt to sketch out the historical matrix from which the present conflict developed, and to identify the possible scenarios that lie ahead. 1 The Kremlin bears the responsibility for unleashing this war, and regardless of the outcome will carry a heavy moral burden for...

Keep Fighting for Someone You Don’t Know

  Nothing was as inspiring to me about Bernie Sanders’s 2020 run as the slogan he used to jump-start the campaign last fall. “Are you willing to fight for that person you don’t even know as much as you’re willing to fight for yourself?” he asked in  his Queens rally speech  in October. He was reviving the gist of an old slogan of the labor movement that badly needs remembering in the time of Trump and the coronavirus: “An injury to one is an injury to all.” Bernie made it clear that the “us” in “Not me, Us” is  all  of us. Wider layers of the Left responded, gravitating to his campaign and identifying with it even more than in 2016. The Sanders 2020 campaign became a point of connection for people and organizations representing the whole range of struggles and causes that emerged in the Trump era and before it. I’m one of those people — the spirit of solidarity that the campaign, whatever its weaknesses, came to represent is the main reason I went  from ske...